Comparison

Alpro Mandeldrink, Original 1L vs Alpro Cooking Soya

Overall, Alpro Cooking Soya has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlpro Mandeldrink, Original...Alpro Cooking Soya
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 23 kcal 142 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 14 g
Saturated fat 0 g 1.6 g
Sugars 2.4 g 1.2 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.3 g 0.6 g
Protein 0.5 g 2 g
Additives21
AllergensNutsSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Alpro Mandeldrink, Original 1L has 84% fewer calories (23 kcal vs 142 kcal).
  • Alpro Mandeldrink, Original 1L has 91% less fat (1.2 g vs 14 g).
  • Alpro Mandeldrink, Original 1L has no saturated fat, while Alpro Cooking Soya has 1.6 g.
  • Alpro Cooking Soya has 50% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Alpro Cooking Soya has 50% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0.3 g).
  • Alpro Cooking Soya has 75% more protein (2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Alpro Cooking Soya has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Alpro Mandeldrink, Original 1L lists: Nuts.
  • Only Alpro Cooking Soya lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Alpro Mandeldrink, Original 1L

Wasser, MANDELN (2,3%), Zucker, Calcium (Tricalciumphosphat), Meersalz, Stabilisatoren (Johannisbrotkernmehl, Gellan), Emulgator (Lecithine), natürliches Aroma, Vitamine (B2, B12, E, D2). Mandeln aus Spanien. Kann Spuren von Schalenfrüchten (keine Erdnüsse) enthalten.

Alpro Cooking Soya

saccharoseestere af fedtsyrer

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alpro Mandeldrink, Original 1L or Alpro Cooking Soya?

Overall, Alpro Cooking Soya has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Alpro Mandeldrink, Original 1L has fewer calories: 23 kcal versus 142 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alpro Cooking Soya has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons