Comparison

Haver barista edition vs Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank

Overall, Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHaver barista editionBio Barista - Biologische sc...
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 61 kcal 59 kcal
Fat 3 g 3.2 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.3 g
Sugars 3.4 g 2.2 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.8 g 0.7 g
Protein 1.1 g 1 g
Additives22
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank has 35% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.4 g).

Ingredients

Haver barista edition

Water, HAVER 10%, koolzaadolie, zuurteregelaar (dikaliumfosfaat), mineralen (calcium - carbonaat, kalium - jodide), zout, vitaminen (D2, riboflavine, B12)

Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank

Water, HAVER* 10% koolzaadolie, zeezout, zuurte - regelaar (kaliumcarbonaat). *Biologisch ingrediënt.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Haver barista edition or Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank?

Overall, Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bio Barista - Biologische schuimbare haverdrank has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons