Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl vs Soft Cheese
Overall, Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl | Soft Cheese |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 372 kcal | 200 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 19.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 22 g | 12.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Soft Cheese has 46% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 372 kcal).
- Soft Cheese has 44% less fat (19.1 g vs 34 g).
- Soft Cheese has 45% less saturated fat (12.1 g vs 22 g).
- Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has 93% less sugar (0.2 g vs 3 g).
- Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has no salt, while Soft Cheese has 0.5 g.
- Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has 77% more protein (16 g vs 3.6 g).
- Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl
pasteurisierte _Milch_, Kochsalz, Käsereikulturen, Paprika 0,6%, Zwiebeln 0,5%, Pfeffer schwarz 0,3%, Kümmel 0,2%, mikrobieller Labaustauschstoff, Farbstoff: Paprikaextrakt
Soft Cheese
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl or Soft Cheese?
Overall, Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Soft Cheese has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Almzeit Biergartenschmankerl has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 3 g per 100 g.