Alaska-Seelachsfilet vs 4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard
Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Alaska-Seelachsfilet
4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Alaska-Seelachsfilet | 4 Tranches de filet de Colin... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 77 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 17.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alaska-Seelachsfilet has no salt, while 4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard has 0.6 g.
Ingredients
Alaska-Seelachsfilet
Filets De Colin d'Alaska (Theragra Chalcogramma).
4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard
Colin d'Alaska (_poisson_) qualité sans arête*, Theragra chalcogramma sauvage pêché au chalut dans l'Océan Pacifique Nord (FAO 61, 67) *présence exceptionnelle d'arête jamais exclue
FAQ
Which is healthier: Alaska-Seelachsfilet or 4 Tranches de filet de Colin d'Alaska Picard?
Overall, Alaska-Seelachsfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alaska-Seelachsfilet has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alaska-Seelachsfilet has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.