Comparison

Alaska Seelachs Mus vs Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets

Overall, Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlaska Seelachs MusDänische Regenbogen Forellen...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 341 kcal 138 kcal
Fat 33 g 5.5 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 1.4 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 8.3 g 5.5 g
Protein 12 g 22 g
Additives20
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets has 60% fewer calories (138 kcal vs 341 kcal).
  • Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets has 83% less fat (5.5 g vs 33 g).
  • Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets has 44% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets has 34% less salt (5.5 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets has 45% more protein (22 g vs 12 g).
  • Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Alaska Seelachs Mus lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Alaska Seelachs Mus

68% Alaska gesalzen, getärbt |Lactsersatz] (Alaska Seelachsfilet, Salz, branntweinessig, Konservierunqsstoft: Natriumbenzoat Raucharoma, farbstoffe: Gelborange S und Cochenillerot A), Rapsol. Kann Spuren von Krebstieren, Eiern, Soja, Milch, Sellerie und Senf enthalten. belborange S und Cochenillerot A: Kann Aktivität und Aufmerksamkeit bei Kindern beeinträchtigen. Seelachs

Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets

forellenfilets, speisesalz, buchenholzrauch

FAQ

Which is healthier: Alaska Seelachs Mus or Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets?

Overall, Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dänische Regenbogen Forellenfilets has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 341 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Alaska Seelachs Mus has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons