Comparison

AH Terra Plantaardige kipstukjes vs Kipstuckjes

Overall, Kipstuckjes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAH Terra Plantaardige kipstu...Kipstuckjes
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 165 kcal 130 kcal
Fat 9.5 g 3.4 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.4 g
Sugars 0.3 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.1 g
Fiber 4 g 7.2 g
Protein 14 g 20 g
Additives33
AllergensGlutenGluten, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kipstuckjes has 21% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 165 kcal).
  • Kipstuckjes has 64% less fat (3.4 g vs 9.5 g).
  • Kipstuckjes has 56% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.9 g).
  • AH Terra Plantaardige kipstukjes has 50% less sugar (0.3 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Kipstuckjes has 44% more fiber (7.2 g vs 4 g).
  • Kipstuckjes has 30% more protein (20 g vs 14 g).
  • Kipstuckjes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Kipstuckjes lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

AH Terra Plantaardige kipstukjes

Gehydrateerd plantaardig eiwit (66% soja, 14% tarwe), plantaardige olie (zonnebloem, raap), E461, natuurlijk aroma's, E267, gemodificeerd maïszetmeel, tarwezetmeel, E270, zout, ijzer, vitamine B12.

Kipstuckjes

SOJASTRUCTUUR 92% (water, SOJA-EIWIT), zonnebloemolie, aroma's, 2% zuurteregelaar (kaliumacetaat), 9 <1% natuurlijk aroma, gejodeerd zout, 9 <1% 9 9 32% voedingszuur (melkzuur, citroenzuur), vitamine B12. Kan TARWE, ROGGE, GERST, HAVER, El bevatten

FAQ

Which is healthier: AH Terra Plantaardige kipstukjes or Kipstuckjes?

Overall, Kipstuckjes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kipstuckjes has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

AH Terra Plantaardige kipstukjes has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons