Huhn Pikant vs Kipstuckjes
Overall, Kipstuckjes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Huhn Pikant | Kipstuckjes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 312 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 3.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 7.2 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans, Milcheiweiß | Gluten, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kipstuckjes has 58% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 312 kcal).
- Kipstuckjes has 88% less fat (3.4 g vs 29 g).
- Kipstuckjes has 89% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Kipstuckjes has 50% more protein (20 g vs 10 g).
- Kipstuckjes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Huhn Pikant lists: Milk, Milcheiweiß.
- Only Kipstuckjes lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Huhn Pikant
Trinkwasser, gekochtes Hühnerfleisch 29%, pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblumen, Raps und Soja) in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen, süße Paprika, Milcheiweiß 3%, Hühnerfett, Kartoffelstärke, konzentrierte Hühnerbrühe (Wasser, Hühnerfleisch), Sojamehl Speisesalz, Gewürze, Chiliextrakt, Hefeextrakt, Gewürzextrakt (Paprika).
Kipstuckjes
SOJASTRUCTUUR 92% (water, SOJA-EIWIT), zonnebloemolie, aroma's, 2% zuurteregelaar (kaliumacetaat), 9 <1% natuurlijk aroma, gejodeerd zout, 9 <1% 9 9 32% voedingszuur (melkzuur, citroenzuur), vitamine B12. Kan TARWE, ROGGE, GERST, HAVER, El bevatten
FAQ
Which is healthier: Huhn Pikant or Kipstuckjes?
Overall, Kipstuckjes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kipstuckjes has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 312 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kipstuckjes has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.