Comparison
Abricot vs Trockenobst
Overall, Trockenobst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Abricot | Trockenobst |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 182 kcal | 255 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 43.3 g | 31.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 6.9 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 3.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abricot has 29% fewer calories (182 kcal vs 255 kcal).
- Trockenobst has 28% less sugar (31.2 g vs 43.3 g).
- Trockenobst has 81% more protein (3.1 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Abricot
Not available.
Trockenobst
Aprikosen aus kontrolliert ökologischer Landwirtschaft
FAQ
Which is healthier: Abricot or Trockenobst?
Overall, Trockenobst has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricot has fewer calories: 182 kcal versus 255 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Trockenobst has less sugar: 31.2 g versus 43.3 g per 100 g.