Comparison
Aardbeien vs Fresas
Overall, Fresas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Aardbeien | Fresas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 33 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 5.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Fresas has 15% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 39 kcal).
- Fresas has no fat, while Aardbeien has 0.5 g.
- Fresas has 96% less sugar (0.2 g vs 5.6 g).
- Aardbeien has 47% more fiber (3.8 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Aardbeien
strawberries
Fresas
Fresones
FAQ
Which is healthier: Aardbeien or Fresas?
Overall, Fresas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Fresas has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 39 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Fresas has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 5.6 g per 100 g.