4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé vs Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé
Overall, 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé
Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 4 Portions de Filet de Colin... | Portions de filets de Colin... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 75 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has 11% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 75 kcal).
- 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has 38% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé
Tranches de filets de colin d'Alaska. Traces de gluten.
Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé
Colin d'Alaska (Theragra chalcogramma) pêché en A) Océan Pacifique Nord-Ouest FAO N°61 ou B) Océan Pacifique Nord-Est FAO N° 67. Pêché au chalut.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé or Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé?
Overall, 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 75 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.