Comparison

4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé vs 2 Pavés Thon Albacore

Overall, 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient4 Portions de Filet de Colin...2 Pavés Thon Albacore
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 67 kcal 103 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0 g
Protein 15 g 23 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has 35% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 103 kcal).
  • 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has 50% less fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has no saturated fat, while 2 Pavés Thon Albacore has 0.5 g.
  • 2 Pavés Thon Albacore has 35% more protein (23 g vs 15 g).
  • Only 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé lists: Fish.

Ingredients

4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé

Tranches de filets de colin d'Alaska. Traces de gluten.

2 Pavés Thon Albacore

Longe de Thon Albacore (Thunnus albacores) péché aux filets tournants et filets soulevés en océan indien, surgelés.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé or 2 Pavés Thon Albacore?

Overall, 4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

4 Portions de Filet de Colin d'Alaska, Surgelé has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons