Comparison

2 Pavés Thon Albacore vs Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé

Overall, Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient2 Pavés Thon AlbacorePortions de filets de Colin...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group — 1
Calories 103 kcal 75 kcal
Fat 1 g 0.8 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 23 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has 27% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 103 kcal).
  • Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has 80% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • 2 Pavés Thon Albacore has 26% more protein (23 g vs 17 g).
  • Only Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé lists: Fish.

Ingredients

2 Pavés Thon Albacore

Longe de Thon Albacore (Thunnus albacores) péché aux filets tournants et filets soulevés en océan indien, surgelés.

Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé

Colin d'Alaska (Theragra chalcogramma) pêché en A) Océan Pacifique Nord-Ouest FAO N°61 ou B) Océan Pacifique Nord-Est FAO N° 67. Pêché au chalut.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 2 Pavés Thon Albacore or Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé?

Overall, Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

2 Pavés Thon Albacore has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons