Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé vs Oeufs de Lompe Rouge
Overall, Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé
Oeufs de Lompe Rouge
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Portions de filets de Colin... | Oeufs de Lompe Rouge |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 75 kcal | 78 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 4.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has 77% less fat (0.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has 93% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has 94% less salt (0.3 g vs 4.1 g).
- Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has 35% more protein (17 g vs 11 g).
- Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has the better Nutri-Score.
- Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé
Colin d'Alaska (Theragra chalcogramma) pêché en A) Océan Pacifique Nord-Ouest FAO N°61 ou B) Océan Pacifique Nord-Est FAO N° 67. Pêché au chalut.
Oeufs de Lompe Rouge
Œufs de lompe 84 % (Cyclopterus lumpus) pêchés en Atlantique Nord-Est et Nord-Ouest (FAO 27 & 21), eau, sel, colorant (E120 ; extrait de carthame), stabilisants (E422, E415), acidifiant (E330), conservateur (E211).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé or Oeufs de Lompe Rouge?
Overall, Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 78 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Portions de filets de Colin d'Alaska, surgelé has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.