4 Lamb Shish Kebabs vs Brochettes de bœuf au fromage
Overall, 4 Lamb Shish Kebabs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 4 Lamb Shish Kebabs | Brochettes de bœuf au fromag... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 227 kcal | 246 kcal |
| Fat | 17.1 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.3 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | — |
| Protein | 14.7 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 4 Lamb Shish Kebabs has 25% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 11 g).
- 4 Lamb Shish Kebabs has 81% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.8 g).
- 4 Lamb Shish Kebabs has 62% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.9 g).
- Brochettes de bœuf au fromage has 14% more protein (17 g vs 14.7 g).
- 4 Lamb Shish Kebabs has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only 4 Lamb Shish Kebabs lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
4 Lamb Shish Kebabs
Lamb (64%) Smoked Lamb (13%). Coriander. Ground spices (Sweet Smoked Paprika. Coriander Cumin Fennel Cinnamon). Water. Lemon Juice Red Chilli Purée Rice Flour. Roasted Garlic Pureé Sea Salt Potato Flour. Light Brown Sugar Cracked Black Pepper. Preservative: E223 (Sulphites) Salt. Serves: 4 Typical values 100g Energy kJ 1093 Energy kcal 264 198 Fat 20.8g 15.6g
Brochettes de bœuf au fromage
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 4 Lamb Shish Kebabs or Brochettes de bœuf au fromage?
Overall, 4 Lamb Shish Kebabs has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
4 Lamb Shish Kebabs has fewer calories: 227 kcal versus 246 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
4 Lamb Shish Kebabs has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.