Comparison

4 filets de cabillaud panure croustillante vs Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais

Overall, 4 filets de cabillaud panure croustillante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient4 filets de cabillaud panure...Filets de cabillaud MSC faço...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 193 kcal 200 kcal
Fat 8.1 g 10.8 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 1 g
Sugars 1.8 g 1.1 g
Salt 0.5 g 1.1 g
Fiber 1.3 g —
Protein 12 g 12.2 g
Additives05
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 4 filets de cabillaud panure croustillante has 25% less fat (8.1 g vs 10.8 g).
  • Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais has 39% less sugar (1.1 g vs 1.8 g).
  • 4 filets de cabillaud panure croustillante has 58% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • 4 filets de cabillaud panure croustillante has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais lists: Milk.

Ingredients

4 filets de cabillaud panure croustillante

Queue de filet de cabillaud MSC (POISSONS) 65% [Gadus morhua sauvage pêché en Atlantique Nord-Est (FAO 27)] qualité sans arête*, farine de BLÉ (GLUTEN), huiles végétales (colza, tournesol) en proportion variable, eau, levure, sel, GLUTEN de BLÉ. Peut contenir des traces de: oeuf, soja, lait, céleri, mollusques.

Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais

Filets de CABILLAUD MSC 65%. Pâte à beignet 35%: eau, farine de BLÉ, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de maïs, amidon de BLÉ, amidon modifié de maïs, GLUTEN de BLÉ, sel, poudres à lever: E450i-E500ii, poudre de LAIT écrémé. Traces possibles de MOLLUSQUES, OEUF, CÉLERI, SOJA.

FAQ

Which is healthier: 4 filets de cabillaud panure croustillante or Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais?

Overall, 4 filets de cabillaud panure croustillante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

4 filets de cabillaud panure croustillante has fewer calories: 193 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons