Comparison

Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais vs Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC

Overall, Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilets de cabillaud MSC faço...Tranches panées de Cabillaud...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 200 kcal 177 kcal
Fat 10.8 g 6.5 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.5 g
Sugars 1.1 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.1 g 0.5 g
Fiber — 1 g
Protein 12.2 g 14 g
Additives50
AllergensFish, Gluten, MilkFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 12% fewer calories (177 kcal vs 200 kcal).
  • Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 40% less fat (6.5 g vs 10.8 g).
  • Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 49% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1 g).
  • Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 45% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 51% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has 13% more protein (14 g vs 12.2 g).
  • Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais

Filets de CABILLAUD MSC 65%. Pâte à beignet 35%: eau, farine de BLÉ, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de maïs, amidon de BLÉ, amidon modifié de maïs, GLUTEN de BLÉ, sel, poudres à lever: E450i-E500ii, poudre de LAIT écrémé. Traces possibles de MOLLUSQUES, OEUF, CÉLERI, SOJA.

Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC

Cabillaud 63%, chapelure 13% (dont farine de blé 12%), eau, huile de colza, farine de blé 4,3%, amidon (pommes de terre, blé), farine d'épeautre complet 1,0%, gluten de blé, sel, poivre noir 0,04%, extrait de poivre noir.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filets de cabillaud MSC façon fish & chips - 200g- Frais or Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC?

Overall, Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has fewer calories: 177 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tranches panées de Cabillaud MSC has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons