Comparison
24 vs 24
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 24 | 24 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 291 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 24 has 32% fewer calories (197 kcal vs 291 kcal).
- 24 has 40% less fat (18 g vs 30 g).
- 24 has 40% less saturated fat (12 g vs 20 g).
- 24 has 31% less sugar (2.9 g vs 4.2 g).
- 24 has 18% more protein (2.8 g vs 2.3 g).
- Only 24 lists: Milk.
Ingredients
24
Not available.
24
cream (milk), lactic starters (milk)
FAQ
Which is healthier: 24 or 24?
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
24 has fewer calories: 197 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
24 has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.