Comparison
24 vs Nata para cocinar
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 24 | Nata para cocinar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 291 kcal | 189 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 12.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 3.7 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata para cocinar has 35% fewer calories (189 kcal vs 291 kcal).
- Nata para cocinar has 40% less fat (18 g vs 30 g).
- Nata para cocinar has 39% less saturated fat (12.2 g vs 20 g).
- 24 has 22% less sugar (2.9 g vs 3.7 g).
- 24 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
24
cream (milk), lactic starters (milk)
Nata para cocinar
light milk cream, natural starch, milk proteins,
FAQ
Which is healthier: 24 or Nata para cocinar?
Overall, Nata para cocinar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata para cocinar has fewer calories: 189 kcal versus 291 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
24 has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3.7 g per 100 g.