24 vs Elmlea Double
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 24 | Elmlea Double |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 291 kcal | 295 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 24 has 22% more protein (2.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- 24 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Elmlea Double lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
24
cream (milk), lactic starters (milk)
Elmlea Double
buttermilk 69%, vegetable oils (coconut, rapeseed), lactose, emulsifiers (soya lecithin, sucrose esters of fatty acids), stabilizers (xanthan gum, locust bean gum, carrageenan), colour (carotenes).
FAQ
Which is healthier: 24 or Elmlea Double?
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
24 has fewer calories: 291 kcal versus 295 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
24 has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3 g per 100 g.