Land: Italian " vs Elmlea Double
Overall, Land: Italian " has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Land: Italian " | Elmlea Double |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 224 kcal | 295 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 15 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 3.8 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 1 | 7 |
| Allergens | Milk, PANNA | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Land: Italian " has 24% fewer calories (224 kcal vs 295 kcal).
- Land: Italian " has 29% less fat (22 g vs 31 g).
- Land: Italian " has 32% less saturated fat (15 g vs 22 g).
- Elmlea Double has 21% less sugar (3 g vs 3.8 g).
- Land: Italian " has 100% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0 g).
- Land: Italian " has 31% more protein (2.6 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only Land: Italian " lists: PANNA.
- Only Elmlea Double lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Land: Italian "
PANNA, stabilizzante (carragenina).
Elmlea Double
buttermilk 69%, vegetable oils (coconut, rapeseed), lactose, emulsifiers (soya lecithin, sucrose esters of fatty acids), stabilizers (xanthan gum, locust bean gum, carrageenan), colour (carotenes).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Land: Italian " or Elmlea Double?
Overall, Land: Italian " has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Land: Italian " has fewer calories: 224 kcal versus 295 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Elmlea Double has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.