24 vs Elmlea Double
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | 24 | Elmlea Double |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 295 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 22 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 24 has 33% fewer calories (197 kcal vs 295 kcal).
- 24 has 42% less fat (18 g vs 31 g).
- 24 has 45% less saturated fat (12 g vs 22 g).
- Elmlea Double has 29% less sugar (3 g vs 4.2 g).
- 24 has 36% more protein (2.8 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only Elmlea Double lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
24
Not available.
Elmlea Double
buttermilk 69%, vegetable oils (coconut, rapeseed), lactose, emulsifiers (soya lecithin, sucrose esters of fatty acids), stabilizers (xanthan gum, locust bean gum, carrageenan), colour (carotenes).
FAQ
Which is healthier: 24 or Elmlea Double?
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
24 has fewer calories: 197 kcal versus 295 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Elmlea Double has less sugar: 3 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.