24 vs HuLaLa
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | 24 | HuLaLa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 197 kcal | 298 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 27 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 2.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 24 has 34% fewer calories (197 kcal vs 298 kcal).
- 24 has 33% less fat (18 g vs 27 g).
- 24 has 56% less saturated fat (12 g vs 27 g).
- 24 has 62% less sugar (4.2 g vs 11 g).
- 24 has 79% more protein (2.8 g vs 0.6 g).
- 24 has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only HuLaLa lists: Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
24
Not available.
HuLaLa
Víz, teljes mértékben hidrogénezett növényi zsírok és olajok (26%] [zsírok: pálmamag, olajok: napraforgó], cukor (11%), stabilizátorok: szorbit, hidroxipropil-cellulóz; tejfehérje, emulgeálószerek: E 472e, lecitinek (szója), E 472b; só, aromák, színezék: karotinok. Nyomokban földimogyorót tartalmazhat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 24 or HuLaLa?
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
24 has fewer calories: 197 kcal versus 298 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
24 has less sugar: 4.2 g versus 11 g per 100 g.