24 vs HuLaLa
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 24 | HuLaLa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 291 kcal | 298 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 20 g | 27 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 2.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 6 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- HuLaLa has 10% less fat (27 g vs 30 g).
- 24 has 26% less saturated fat (20 g vs 27 g).
- 24 has 74% less sugar (2.9 g vs 11 g).
- 24 has 74% more protein (2.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- 24 has the better Nutri-Score.
- 24 is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only HuLaLa lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
24
cream (milk), lactic starters (milk)
HuLaLa
Víz, teljes mértékben hidrogénezett növényi zsírok és olajok (26%] [zsírok: pálmamag, olajok: napraforgó], cukor (11%), stabilizátorok: szorbit, hidroxipropil-cellulóz; tejfehérje, emulgeálószerek: E 472e, lecitinek (szója), E 472b; só, aromák, színezék: karotinok. Nyomokban földimogyorót tartalmazhat.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 24 or HuLaLa?
Overall, 24 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
24 has fewer calories: 291 kcal versus 298 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
24 has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 11 g per 100 g.