Comparison
0049387100118 vs Requesón
Overall, 0049387100118 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 0049387100118 | Requesón |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 152 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 10.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 7.2 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 4.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 0049387100118 has 56% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 152 kcal).
- 0049387100118 has 67% less fat (3.3 g vs 10.2 g).
- 0049387100118 has 71% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 7.2 g).
- Requesón has 67% more protein (10 g vs 3.3 g).
Ingredients
0049387100118
Milk with vitamin d3 added.
Requesón
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 0049387100118 or Requesón?
Overall, 0049387100118 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
0049387100118 has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 152 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Requesón has less sugar: 4.9 g versus 5 g per 100 g.