Comparison
0049387100118 vs Flam de mató
Overall, 0049387100118 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 0049387100118 | Flam de mató |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 67 kcal | 161 kcal |
| Fat | 3.3 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 15.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 4.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 0049387100118 has 58% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 161 kcal).
- 0049387100118 has 58% less fat (3.3 g vs 8 g).
- 0049387100118 has 64% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 5.7 g).
- 0049387100118 has 67% less sugar (5 g vs 15.2 g).
- Flam de mató has 24% more protein (4.4 g vs 3.3 g).
Ingredients
0049387100118
Milk with vitamin d3 added.
Flam de mató
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: 0049387100118 or Flam de mató?
Overall, 0049387100118 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
0049387100118 has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 161 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
0049387100118 has less sugar: 5 g versus 15.2 g per 100 g.