View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
White tiger Garnelen
White tiger Garnelen by blue planet provides 65 kcal per 100 g, with 0.5 g of sugars and 13 g of protein. That is 38% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is A and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Prawns category and comes in a 750 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 65 kcal | 111 −42% |
| Total fat | 1 g | 4.1 −76% |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.8 −87% |
| Carbohydrates | 0.9 g | 2 −55% |
| Total sugars | 0.5 g | 0.8 −38% |
| Added sugars | 0 g | 0.8 −100% |
| Protein | 13 g | 16.3 −20% |
| Salt | 1.2 g | 1.4 −12% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 575 Prawns products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other prawns
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
White Tiger Garnelen (65%), Wasser, Salz, Stabilisator: E-339, E-451, E-452
Additives 3
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 750 g
- Sold in
- Germany
- Barcode
- 4250357409360
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in White tiger Garnelen?
White tiger Garnelen contains 65 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in White tiger Garnelen?
White tiger Garnelen has 0.5 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is White tiger Garnelen healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of A (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 25, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 1 
a NOVA 3 
a NOVA 3 More prawns
View all →
b 
a NOVA 3 
b NOVA 3 
a NOVA 3 
d NOVA 3 
b NOVA 3 More from blue planet
View all →
a 
b