View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Salt sideflesk i skiver
Salt sideflesk i skiver by Fatland provides 351 kcal per 100 g, with 0 g of sugars and 12.4 g of protein. That is 100% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Pork category and comes in a 0,400kg pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 351 kcal | 204 +72% |
| Total fat | 33.3 g | 12.7 +162% |
| Saturated fat | 12.5 g | 4.7 +165% |
| Carbohydrates | 0.3 g | 1.8 −84% |
| Total sugars | 0 g | 0.8 −100% |
| Added sugars | 1.2 g | 1 +16% |
| Protein | 12.4 g | 20.6 −40% |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.9 |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2139 Pork products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other pork
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
Svin sideflesk 91%, vann, salt, stabilisator (E450, E451), dekstrose, antioksidant E301, konserveringsmiddle E250.
Additives 3
Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.
Product details
- Quantity
- 0,400kg
- Sold in
- Norway
- Barcode
- 7028461006792
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Salt sideflesk i skiver?
Salt sideflesk i skiver contains 351 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in Salt sideflesk i skiver?
Salt sideflesk i skiver has 0 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Salt sideflesk i skiver healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated June 18, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
b 
c NOVA 1 
c NOVA 1 
c NOVA 3 More pork
View all →
d NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
c 
d NOVA 4 
e NOVA 4 
