Ruby Tuesday, Colossal Burger
Ruby Tuesday, Colossal Burger by Ruby Tuesday is listed in the Hamburgers category. That is 145% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It comes in a 1 serving(s) pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 100g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fat | 90 g | 90 g | 115% | 24.3 +270% |
| Saturated fat | 29 g | 29 g | 145% | 9.1 +218% |
| Total sugars | 13 g | 13 g | 5.3 +145% | |
| Dietary fiber | 8 g | 8 g | 29% | 2.3 +242% |
| Protein | 90 g | 90 g | 180% | 22.3 +304% |
| Salt | 10 g | 10 g | 2.4 +318% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1425 Hamburgers products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other hamburgers
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
undefined
Product details
- Quantity
- 1 serving(s)
- Serving size
- 100g
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 99893749474489400213
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How much sugar is in Ruby Tuesday, Colossal Burger?
Ruby Tuesday, Colossal Burger has 13 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Ruby Tuesday, Colossal Burger healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 21, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
a 
a NOVA 4 More hamburgers
View all →
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 4 
d NOVA 3