View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
River City Chicken
River City Chicken provides 222 kcal per 100 g, with 2 g of sugars and 21.2 g of protein. That is 98% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Meats category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Category avg |
|---|---|---|
| Calories | 222 kcal | 205 +9% |
| Total fat | 13.6 g | 12.9 +6% |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 4.8 −37% |
| Carbohydrates | 3.5 g | 3.6 |
| Total sugars | 2 g | 1 +98% |
| Dietary fiber | 1 g | 1 |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 18.4 +16% |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.5 +18% |
*% Daily Value for 100 g, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3361 Meats products on Foodmetria.
Nutrition claims check
Claims its numbers support
- High protein
- 38% of calories from protein (EU: at least 20% of calories from protein)
- Low sugar
- 2 g sugars per 100 g (EU: no more than 5 g per 100 g)
Checked against the per-100 g thresholds of EU Regulation 1924/2006, using the nutrition data above. US labels follow FDA rules, which are mostly based on serving size and can give a different result; FDA has no defined “low sugar” claim.
Compared with other meats
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 2065817007992
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in River City Chicken?
River City Chicken contains 222 kcal per 100 g.
How much sugar is in River City Chicken?
River City Chicken has 2 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is River City Chicken healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 16, 2022. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 4
a NOVA 1
a NOVA 4
a NOVA 1 More meats
View all →
c NOVA 4
e NOVA 3
e NOVA 4
d NOVA 4
c NOVA 4
c NOVA 4