PF Chang's, Miso Butterscotch Pudding
PF Chang's, Miso Butterscotch Pudding by PF Chang's provides 282 kcal per 100 g, with 21 g of sugars and 2 g of protein. That is 28% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is E. It is listed in the Desserts category and comes in a 1 serving(s) pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 100g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 282 kcal | 282 kcal | 292 | |
| Total fat | 18 g | 18 g | 23% | 14.2 +26% |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 11 g | 55% | 7.9 +38% |
| Carbohydrates | 28 g | 28 g | 10% | 40.5 −31% |
| Total sugars | 21 g | 21 g | 29.3 −28% | |
| Dietary fiber | 0 g | 0 g | 0% | 1.6 −100% |
| Protein | 2 g | 2 g | 4% | 4.9 −59% |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g | 0.8 −71% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 3370 Desserts products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other desserts
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
undefined
Product details
- Quantity
- 1 serving(s)
- Serving size
- 100g
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 35811564568680849045
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in PF Chang's, Miso Butterscotch Pudding?
PF Chang's, Miso Butterscotch Pudding contains 282 kcal per 100 g and about 282 kcal per serving (100g).
How much sugar is in PF Chang's, Miso Butterscotch Pudding?
PF Chang's, Miso Butterscotch Pudding has 21 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is PF Chang's, Miso Butterscotch Pudding healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of E (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 20, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 
a NOVA 4 More desserts
View all →
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3 
c 
c 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 More from PF Chang's
View all →
b NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
e 
NOVA 4 
NOVA 4