Lundberg Olde World Pilaf
Lundberg Olde World Pilaf by Pcc Farmland Trust provides 652 kcal per 100 g, with 4.9 g of sugars and 24.7 g of protein. That is 74% less sugar than the average product in this category. It is classified as NOVA 1 (unprocessed or minimally processed). It is listed in the Null category and comes in a 45 g pack.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 45g
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 652 kcal | 293 kcal | 374 +74% | |
| Total fat | 7.4 g | 3.3 g | 4% | 18.8 −61% |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 1.1 g | 6% | 11.4 −78% |
| Total sugars | 4.9 g | 2.2 g | 18.7 −74% | |
| Dietary fiber | 22.2 g | 10 g | 36% | 10.7 +108% |
| Protein | 24.7 g | 11.1 g | 22% | 17.2 +43% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 356 Null products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other null
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Ingredients
BROWN RICE, WEHANI RICE, BLACK JAPONICA RICE, BLACK-EYED PEAS, BROWN LENTILS, GREEN SPLIT PEAS, YELLOW SPLIT PEAS
Product details
- Quantity
- 45 g
- Serving size
- 45g
- Sold in
- United States
- Barcode
- 00039291
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Lundberg Olde World Pilaf?
Lundberg Olde World Pilaf contains 652 kcal per 100 g and about 293 kcal per serving (45g).
How much sugar is in Lundberg Olde World Pilaf?
Lundberg Olde World Pilaf has 4.9 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Lundberg Olde World Pilaf healthy?
It is in NOVA group 1 — unprocessed or minimally processed. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated February 21, 2025. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
More null
View all →
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 4 
NOVA 4 
b NOVA 3 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3