View full-size photo · Photo: Open Food Facts contributors, CC BY-SA
Itsu Teriyaki Chicken Ramen Bowl
Itsu Teriyaki Chicken Ramen Bowl by Itsu provides 302 kcal per 100 g, with 9 g of sugars and 5.7 g of protein. That is 215% more sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Noodles category.
Nutrient levels per 100 g
Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.
Nutrition facts
Serving size: 1 portion (81 g)
| Nutrient | Per 100 g | Per serving | % DV* | Category avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 302 kcal | 245 kcal | 312 | |
| Total fat | 3.3 g | 2.7 g | 3% | 3.9 −15% |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g | 2% | 1.2 −61% |
| Carbohydrates | 60.5 g | 49 g | 18% | 56.9 +6% |
| Total sugars | 9 g | 7.3 g | 2.9 +215% | |
| Dietary fiber | 2.4 g | 1.9 g | 7% | 3.5 −34% |
| Protein | 5.7 g | 4.6 g | 9% | 10.1 −44% |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g | 0.9 −99% |
*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 2055 Noodles products on Foodmetria.
Compared with other noodles
Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.
Product details
- Serving size
- 1 portion (81 g)
- Sold in
- United Kingdom
- Barcode
- 5060960663979
Prices reported by shoppers
Loading prices…
Frequently asked questions
How many calories are in Itsu Teriyaki Chicken Ramen Bowl?
Itsu Teriyaki Chicken Ramen Bowl contains 302 kcal per 100 g and about 245 kcal per serving (1 portion (81 g)).
How much sugar is in Itsu Teriyaki Chicken Ramen Bowl?
Itsu Teriyaki Chicken Ramen Bowl has 9 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.
Is Itsu Teriyaki Chicken Ramen Bowl healthy?
It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.
Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated June 3, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.
Reviews
Compare & rankings
Healthier alternatives
Best in category →Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.
a NOVA 1 
a 
a NOVA 4 
a More noodles
View all →
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 1 
b 
c NOVA 3 
c NOVA 4 
b NOVA 3 More from Itsu
View all →
a NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4 
c NOVA 3 
b NOVA 4 
c NOVA 4