Gelée cuisson à l'ancienne Coing au sucre de Canne

in Quince jellies Barcode 3193840005995
Poor nutritional quality
Green-Score
c
Environmental impact estimate

Gelée cuisson à l'ancienne Coing au sucre de Canne provides 253 kcal per 100 g, with 60 g of sugars and 0.2 g of protein. Its Nutri-Score is D. It is listed in the Quince jellies category.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
0.2 g · Low
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
60 g · High
Salt
0 g · Low

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 253 kcal 237 +7%
Total fat 0.2 g 0.6 −64%
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 −100%
Carbohydrates 62 g 58.3 +6%
Total sugars 60 g 55.4 +8%
Protein 0.2 g 0.4 −44%
Salt 0 g 0.3 −100%

Category average across 59 Quince jellies products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other quince jellies

Calories higher 26%
Sugars higher 26%
Salt lower 1%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 73%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Sold in
France
Barcode
3193840005995

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Gelée cuisson à l'ancienne Coing au sucre de Canne?

Gelée cuisson à l'ancienne Coing au sucre de Canne contains 253 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Gelée cuisson à l'ancienne Coing au sucre de Canne?

Gelée cuisson à l'ancienne Coing au sucre de Canne has 60 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered high by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Gelée cuisson à l'ancienne Coing au sucre de Canne healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 24, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Gelée cuisson à l'ancienne Coing au sucre de Canne? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More quince jellies

View all →