Burger de pollo

by Eroski 360 g in Chickens Barcode 8480010308792
Average nutritional quality
Green-Score
e
Environmental impact estimate

Burger de pollo by Eroski provides 152 kcal per 100 g, with 0.6 g of sugars and 15 g of protein. That is 43% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is C. It is listed in the Chickens category and comes in a 360 g pack.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
9.5 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
3 g · Moderate
Sugars
0.6 g · Low
Salt
1.6 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Nutrient Per 100 g Category avg
Calories 152 kcal 162 −6%
Total fat 9.5 g 7.6 +26%
Saturated fat 3 g 2 +53%
Carbohydrates 2.1 g 5 −58%
Total sugars 0.6 g 1 −43%
Dietary fiber 0 g 0.8 −100%
Protein 15 g 18.4 −18%
Salt 1.6 g 1.3 +21%

Category average across 3720 Chickens products on Foodmetria.

Compared with other chickens

Calories lower 48%
Sugars higher 47%
Salt higher 23%
Saturated fat higher 22%
Protein top 81%
Fiber top 100%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Product details

Quantity
360 g
Labels & certifications
No glutenNo lactoseNutriscoreNutriscore Grade C
Sold in
Spain
Barcode
8480010308792

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Burger de pollo?

Burger de pollo contains 152 kcal per 100 g.

How much sugar is in Burger de pollo?

Burger de pollo has 0.6 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered low by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Burger de pollo healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of C (A is best, E is worst). Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated March 27, 2026. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Burger de pollo? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More chickens

View all →

More from Eroski

View all →