Nutrition report ready

Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix

Calories, Nutri-Score, processing level, additives, ingredients and shopper prices.

Nutri-Score D NOVA 4

View details

Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix

in Cooking helpers Barcode 0016000427310
Poor nutritional quality
Ultra-processed food

Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix provides 375 kcal per 100 g, with 14.3 g of sugars and 8.9 g of protein. That is 25% less sugar than the average product in this category. Its Nutri-Score is D and it is classified as NOVA 4 (ultra-processed food). It is listed in the Cooking helpers category. Contains: eggs, gluten, milk, soybeans.

Nutrient levels per 100 g

Fat
5.4 g · Moderate
Saturated fat
0 g · Low
Sugars
14.3 g · Moderate
Salt
2 g · High

Levels use UK front-of-pack reference thresholds.

Nutrition facts

Serving size: 1/2 Cup Mix (56 g)

Nutrient Per 100 g Per serving% DV* Category avg
Calories 375 kcal 210 kcal 336 +12%
Total fat 5.4 g 3 g 4% 10 −46%
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g 0% 5.3 −100%
Carbohydrates 71.4 g 40 g 15% 54.5 +31%
Total sugars 14.3 g 8 g 19.1 −25%
Added sugarsUSDA 14.3 g 8 g 16% 17.3 −17%
Dietary fiber 3.6 g 2 g 7% 7.4 −51%
Protein 8.9 g 5 g 10% 8.7
Salt 2 g 1.1 g 3.9 −49%

*% Daily Value for a serving, based on a 2,000-calorie diet (FDA reference values). Category average across 1675 Cooking helpers products on Foodmetria.

Serving size and added sugars from the US product label in USDA FoodData Central, label data from February 2024. Other values: Open Food Facts.

Nutrition claims check

Claims its numbers support

Low saturated fat
0 g per 100 g, 0% of calories (EU: no more than 1.5 g per 100 g and 10% of calories)
Source of fiber
3.6 g fiber per 100 g (EU: at least 3 g per 100 g or 1.5 g per 100 kcal)

Checked against the per-100 g thresholds of EU Regulation 1924/2006, using the nutrition data above. US labels follow FDA rules, which are mostly based on serving size and can give a different result; FDA has no defined “low sugar” claim.

Compared with other cooking helpers

Calories higher 40%
Sugars higher 42%
Salt higher 30%
Saturated fat lower 1%
Protein top 34%
Fiber top 44%

Bar shows the share of products in this category that contain less of the nutrient.

Ingredients

Enriched flour bleached (wheat flour, niacin, iron, thiamin mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), whole wheat flour, sugar, defatted soy flour, baking powder (baking soda, sodium aluminum phosphate, monocalcium phosphate), canola oil, dextrose, buttermilk, salt, egg yolk with sodium silicoaluminate, egg white, datem.

May contain palm oilNot vegan
Allergens
EggsGlutenMilkSoybeans

Additives 7

High overexposure risk

Overexposure risk is based on EFSA evaluations as recorded by Open Food Facts.

Product details

Serving size
1/2 Cup Mix (56 g)
Sold in
United States
Barcode
0016000427310

Prices reported by shoppers

Loading prices…

Frequently asked questions

How many calories are in Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix?

Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix contains 375 kcal per 100 g and about 210 kcal per serving (1/2 Cup Mix (56 g)).

How much sugar is in Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix?

Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix has 14.3 g of sugars per 100 g, which is considered moderate by UK front-of-pack guidelines.

Is Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix healthy?

It has a Nutri-Score of D (A is best, E is worst); it is in NOVA group 4 — ultra-processed food. Scores describe nutritional quality and processing, not suitability for your individual diet.

Is Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix vegan?

Based on its ingredient list, it is not vegan.

What allergens does Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix contain?

According to the label data it contains: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans. Recipes change — always check the package label.

Source: Open Food Facts (ODbL). Last updated April 23, 2020. Spotted a mistake? Edit this product on Open Food Facts. Not medical advice — always check the package label.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Tried Bisquick Buttermilk Pancake & Waffle Mix? Be the first to share how it tastes.

Write a review

Your rating

Reviews are moderated. See our Privacy Policy.

Compare & rankings

Healthier alternatives

Best in category →

Same category, meaningfully better on at least one measure and no worse on the others. Each card shows what improves.

More cooking helpers

View all →