Ziegenkäse vs Old Amsterdam
Overall, Ziegenkäse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ziegenkäse | Old Amsterdam |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 388 kcal | 431 kcal |
| Fat | 33.6 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 23.3 g | 23.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 29 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ziegenkäse has 30% less salt (1.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Old Amsterdam has 26% more protein (29 g vs 21.4 g).
- Ziegenkäse has the better Nutri-Score.
- Ziegenkäse is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Ziegenkäse
Pasteurisierte Ziegenmilch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskultur, mikrobielles Lab
Old Amsterdam
Pasteurisierte Kuhmilch, Salz, Käsereikulturen (Milch), tierisches Lab, Konservierungsstoff: E251, Farbstoff: E160a
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ziegenkäse or Old Amsterdam?
Overall, Ziegenkäse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ziegenkäse has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 431 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ziegenkäse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.