Ziegenkäse vs Leerdammer maxi portion
Overall, Leerdammer maxi portion has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ziegenkäse | Leerdammer maxi portion |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 388 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 33.6 g | 27.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 23.3 g | 18.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Leerdammer maxi portion has 18% less fat (27.5 g vs 33.6 g).
- Leerdammer maxi portion has 21% less saturated fat (18.5 g vs 23.3 g).
- Leerdammer maxi portion has 21% more protein (27 g vs 21.4 g).
Ingredients
Ziegenkäse
Pasteurisierte Ziegenmilch, Speisesalz, Säuerungskultur, mikrobielles Lab
Leerdammer maxi portion
LAIT, sel, ferments LACTIQUES, enzyme coagulante microbienne, dans la croûte : conservateur : natamycine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ziegenkäse or Leerdammer maxi portion?
Overall, Leerdammer maxi portion has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Leerdammer maxi portion has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 388 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ziegenkäse has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.