Gouda Geschmack Scheiben vs Leerdammer maxi portion
Overall, Leerdammer maxi portion has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Gouda Geschmack Scheiben
Leerdammer maxi portion
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Gouda Geschmack Scheiben | Leerdammer maxi portion |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 285 kcal | 356 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 27.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 18.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gouda Geschmack Scheiben has 20% fewer calories (285 kcal vs 356 kcal).
- Gouda Geschmack Scheiben has 16% less fat (23 g vs 27.5 g).
- Leerdammer maxi portion has 12% less saturated fat (18.5 g vs 21 g).
- Leerdammer maxi portion has 35% less salt (1.5 g vs 2.3 g).
- Leerdammer maxi portion has 100% more protein (27 g vs 0 g).
- Leerdammer maxi portion has the better Nutri-Score.
- Leerdammer maxi portion is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Leerdammer maxi portion lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Gouda Geschmack Scheiben
WASSER, KOKOSÖL (23%), MOOIFIZIERTE STÄRKE, STÄRKE, MEERSALZ, AROMEN, OLIVENEXTRAKT, FARBSTOFF: BETA-CAROTIN, VITAMIN B12
Leerdammer maxi portion
LAIT, sel, ferments LACTIQUES, enzyme coagulante microbienne, dans la croûte : conservateur : natamycine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Gouda Geschmack Scheiben or Leerdammer maxi portion?
Overall, Leerdammer maxi portion has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gouda Geschmack Scheiben has fewer calories: 285 kcal versus 356 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gouda Geschmack Scheiben has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.