Comparison

ZERO Secco vs Prosecco DOC frizzante

Overall, Prosecco DOC frizzante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientZERO SeccoProsecco DOC frizzante
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 31 kcal 8 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 6.6 g 1.5 g
Salt — 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives26
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Prosecco DOC frizzante has 74% fewer calories (8 kcal vs 31 kcal).
  • Prosecco DOC frizzante has 77% less sugar (1.5 g vs 6.6 g).

Ingredients

ZERO Secco

Entalkoholisierter Wein (Trauben, rektifiziertes Traubenmostkonzentrat), Kohlensäure, Konservierungsstoff: E 242, Sulfite

Prosecco DOC frizzante

Uve, mosto di uve concentrato, gomma arabica, carbossimetilcellulosa, poliaspartato di potassio, acido fumarico, acido malico (D,L-/L-), acido tartarico (L(+)-), acido citrico, solfiti, acido L-ascorbico

FAQ

Which is healthier: ZERO Secco or Prosecco DOC frizzante?

Overall, Prosecco DOC frizzante has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Prosecco DOC frizzante has fewer calories: 8 kcal versus 31 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Prosecco DOC frizzante has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 6.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons