Zartbitter no sugar added vs Chocolate 50% stevia
Overall, Zartbitter no sugar added has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zartbitter no sugar added | Chocolate 50% stevia |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 453 kcal | 436 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 31 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | — |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Zartbitter no sugar added has 24% more protein (6.7 g vs 5.1 g).
- Only Chocolate 50% stevia lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Zartbitter no sugar added
Süßungsmittel: Maltit, Kakaomasse*, Kakaobutter*, Inulin (6%), fettarmer Kakao*, Emulgator: Lecithine (aus Soja), natürliches Aroma
Chocolate 50% stevia
Edulcorantes (maltitol y glucósido de steviol (0,02%), pasta de cacao, manteca de cacao, emulgente (lecitina de soja) y aroma. Cacao: 50% mínimo. Puede contener frutos de cáscara y leche.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zartbitter no sugar added or Chocolate 50% stevia?
Overall, Zartbitter no sugar added has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocolate 50% stevia has fewer calories: 436 kcal versus 453 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zartbitter no sugar added has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.