Zartbitter no sugar added vs Stella Sugarless Schokolade Bitter 100 g
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Zartbitter no sugar added
Stella Sugarless Schokolade Bitter 100 g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Zartbitter no sugar added | Stella Sugarless Schokolade... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 453 kcal | 446 kcal |
| Fat | 31 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 14 g | — |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Only Stella Sugarless Schokolade Bitter 100 g lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Zartbitter no sugar added
Süßungsmittel: Maltit, Kakaomasse*, Kakaobutter*, Inulin (6%), fettarmer Kakao*, Emulgator: Lecithine (aus Soja), natürliches Aroma
Stella Sugarless Schokolade Bitter 100 g
Sweetener maltitol, cocoa mass, cocoa butter, milk fat, emulsifier (sunflower lecithin), vanilla extract
FAQ
Which is healthier: Zartbitter no sugar added or Stella Sugarless Schokolade Bitter 100 g?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Stella Sugarless Schokolade Bitter 100 g has fewer calories: 446 kcal versus 453 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Zartbitter no sugar added has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.