Comparison

Wild Salmon Steaks vs 4 Filets Saumon Rose du Pacifique

Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientWild Salmon Steaks4 Filets Saumon Rose du Paci...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 84 kcal 103 kcal
Fat 1.3 g 2.2 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g 0.5 g
Protein 18 g 21 g
Additives00
AllergensFishFish, Saumon rose du Pacifique

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wild Salmon Steaks has 18% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 103 kcal).
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has 41% less fat (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Wild Salmon Steaks has no sugar, while 4 Filets Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 0.5 g.
  • 4 Filets Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • 4 Filets Saumon Rose du Pacifique has 14% more protein (21 g vs 18 g).
  • Only 4 Filets Saumon Rose du Pacifique lists: Saumon rose du Pacifique.

Ingredients

Wild Salmon Steaks

Wild Pink Salmon MSC (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha).

4 Filets Saumon Rose du Pacifique

Filets de _Saumon rose du Pacifique_ MSC (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) pêchées à la senne ou aux chaluts ou aux filets maillants et filets similaires ou aux filets tournants et filets soulevés en Océan Pacifique Nord-Ouest et Pacifique Nord-Est.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Wild Salmon Steaks or 4 Filets Saumon Rose du Pacifique?

Overall, Wild Salmon Steaks has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wild Salmon Steaks has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Wild Salmon Steaks has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons