Comparison
Whole Milk vs Uht jibal 1/2L
Overall, Uht jibal 1/2L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Whole Milk | Uht jibal 1/2L |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | — |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 65 kcal | 55 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 4.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Uht jibal 1/2L has 15% fewer calories (55 kcal vs 65 kcal).
- Uht jibal 1/2L has 19% less fat (3 g vs 3.7 g).
- Uht jibal 1/2L has 17% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.4 g).
- Uht jibal 1/2L has 98% less sugar (0.1 g vs 4.7 g).
- Whole Milk has 14% more protein (3.5 g vs 3 g).
- Only Uht jibal 1/2L lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Whole Milk
PASTEURISED STANDARDISED HOMOGENISED WHOLE MILK
Uht jibal 1/2L
Lait entier, 30g/L de matière grasse.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Whole Milk or Uht jibal 1/2L?
Overall, Uht jibal 1/2L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Uht jibal 1/2L has fewer calories: 55 kcal versus 65 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Uht jibal 1/2L has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 4.7 g per 100 g.