Comparison
Uht jibal 1/2L vs Helmelk 3,5%
Overall, Uht jibal 1/2L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Uht jibal 1/2L | Helmelk 3,5% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 55 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Uht jibal 1/2L has 14% fewer calories (55 kcal vs 64 kcal).
- Uht jibal 1/2L has 14% less fat (3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Uht jibal 1/2L has 98% less sugar (0.1 g vs 4.5 g).
- Helmelk 3,5% has 14% more protein (3.5 g vs 3 g).
Ingredients
Uht jibal 1/2L
Lait entier, 30g/L de matière grasse.
Helmelk 3,5%
Helmelk
FAQ
Which is healthier: Uht jibal 1/2L or Helmelk 3,5%?
Overall, Uht jibal 1/2L has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Uht jibal 1/2L has fewer calories: 55 kcal versus 64 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Uht jibal 1/2L has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.