White chocolate, matcha green tea, coconut and lemon vs Blanco White Chocolate
Overall, Blanco White Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | White chocolate, matcha gree... | Blanco White Chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 451 kcal | 461 kcal |
| Fat | 35.2 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 21.8 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 16.9 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 4 g |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blanco White Chocolate has 47% less sugar (9 g vs 16.9 g).
- Blanco White Chocolate has 67% less salt (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- White chocolate, matcha green tea, coconut and lemon has 38% more protein (9.6 g vs 6 g).
- Blanco White Chocolate has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Blanco White Chocolate lists: Milk.
Ingredients
White chocolate, matcha green tea, coconut and lemon
Not available.
Blanco White Chocolate
Sweetener (maltitol), cocoa butter, whole milk powder, inuline, emulsifier (sunflower lecithin) and natural flavour of vanilla.
FAQ
Which is healthier: White chocolate, matcha green tea, coconut and lemon or Blanco White Chocolate?
Overall, Blanco White Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
White chocolate, matcha green tea, coconut and lemon has fewer calories: 451 kcal versus 461 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blanco White Chocolate has less sugar: 9 g versus 16.9 g per 100 g.