Comparison

Chocolat blanc avec coco et édulcorant vs Blanco White Chocolate

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChocolat blanc avec coco et...Blanco White Chocolate
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 486 kcal 461 kcal
Fat 35 g 32 g
Saturated fat 22 g 20 g
Sugars 7 g 9 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 4 g 4 g
Protein 5 g 6 g
Additives33
AllergensMilk, SoybeansMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chocolat blanc avec coco et édulcorant has 22% less sugar (7 g vs 9 g).
  • Blanco White Chocolate has 17% more protein (6 g vs 5 g).
  • Only Chocolat blanc avec coco et édulcorant lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chocolat blanc avec coco et édulcorant

Edulcorant (maltitol), beurre de cacao, lait entier en poudre (18%), noix de coco rapée (6%), inuline, émulsifiant (lécithine de tournesol), arôme naturel de vanille Une consommation excessive peut avoir des effets laxatifs. Il peut contenir de traces de soja, sésame et fruits à coque. Contient des sucres naturellement présents.

Blanco White Chocolate

Sweetener (maltitol), cocoa butter, whole milk powder, inuline, emulsifier (sunflower lecithin) and natural flavour of vanilla.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chocolat blanc avec coco et édulcorant or Blanco White Chocolate?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Blanco White Chocolate has fewer calories: 461 kcal versus 486 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chocolat blanc avec coco et édulcorant has less sugar: 7 g versus 9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons