Diablo Sugar Free Dark Chocolate vs Blanco White Chocolate
Overall, Blanco White Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Diablo Sugar Free Dark Choco... | Blanco White Chocolate |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 486 kcal | 461 kcal |
| Fat | 34 g | 32 g |
| Saturated fat | 21 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 10 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 4 g |
| Protein | 5.9 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 4 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blanco White Chocolate has 10% less sugar (9 g vs 10 g).
- Only Diablo Sugar Free Dark Chocolate lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Diablo Sugar Free Dark Chocolate
Sweeteners (maltitol and steviol glycosides (0,02%)), cocoa butter, whole milk powder, butter, emulsifier (soya lecithin) and flavouring.
Blanco White Chocolate
Sweetener (maltitol), cocoa butter, whole milk powder, inuline, emulsifier (sunflower lecithin) and natural flavour of vanilla.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Diablo Sugar Free Dark Chocolate or Blanco White Chocolate?
Overall, Blanco White Chocolate has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blanco White Chocolate has fewer calories: 461 kcal versus 486 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blanco White Chocolate has less sugar: 9 g versus 10 g per 100 g.