White Chocolate Macadamia Nut vs Monster Energy Zero Sugar
Overall, Monster Energy Zero Sugar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | White Chocolate Macadamia Nu... | Monster Energy Zero Sugar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 387 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 25 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 7.4 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 7 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster Energy Zero Sugar has 99% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 387 kcal).
- Monster Energy Zero Sugar has no fat, while White Chocolate Macadamia Nut has 11 g.
- Monster Energy Zero Sugar has no saturated fat, while White Chocolate Macadamia Nut has 2.1 g.
- Monster Energy Zero Sugar has no sugar, while White Chocolate Macadamia Nut has 25 g.
- Monster Energy Zero Sugar has 84% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- White Chocolate Macadamia Nut has 100% more protein (14 g vs 0 g).
- Monster Energy Zero Sugar has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only White Chocolate Macadamia Nut lists: Gluten, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
White Chocolate Macadamia Nut
Flocons d'avoine* (21,9%), sirop de riz brun*, fèves de soja grillées*, riz soufflé au soja (isolat de protéine de soja, farine de riz, extrait de malt d'orge), sirop de tapioca*, sirop de canne*, noix de macadamia (4,9%), fibre de racine de chicorée, farine de soja*, sucre de canne*, huile de tournesol et/ou de soja, arômes naturels, sel, beurre de cacao (0,9%), farine de soja, antioxydant: extrait riche en tocopherols, émulsifiant : lécithine de soja. 70% d'ingrédients biologiques Biologique PEUT CONTENIR DES ARACHIDES, D'AUTRES FRUITS À COQUE, DU LAIT, DU SÉSAME, DU SEIGLE, DU TRITICALE ET DU BLÉ.
Monster Energy Zero Sugar
Sprankelend water, smaakversterker (erytritol), voedingszuur (citroenzuur), taurine (0,4%), zuurteregelaar (natriumcitraten), aroma's, ginsengwortelextract (0,08%), conserveermiddelen (kaliumsorbaat, natriumbenzoaat), cafeïne (0,03%), zoetstof (sucralose), L-carnitine-L-tartraat (0,02%), vitamines (niacine, B6, riboflavine, B12), stabilisator (glycerolesters van houthars), guarana extract (0,002%), inositol.
FAQ
Which is healthier: White Chocolate Macadamia Nut or Monster Energy Zero Sugar?
Overall, Monster Energy Zero Sugar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Monster Energy Zero Sugar has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 387 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Monster Energy Zero Sugar has less sugar: 0 g versus 25 g per 100 g.