Weinblätter gefüllt mit Reis vs Onassis Feuilles de Vigne Farcies avec Riz
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Weinblätter gefüllt mit Reis
Onassis Feuilles de Vigne Farcies avec Riz
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Weinblätter gefüllt mit Reis | Onassis Feuilles de Vigne Fa... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 158 kcal | 158 kcal |
| Fat | 7.5 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.1 g | 1.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | — |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 2.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Weinblätter gefüllt mit Reis has 25% less fat (7.5 g vs 10 g).
- Weinblätter gefüllt mit Reis has 35% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Onassis Feuilles de Vigne Farcies avec Riz has 61% less sugar (1.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Onassis Feuilles de Vigne Farcies avec Riz has 20% less salt (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Only Onassis Feuilles de Vigne Farcies avec Riz lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Weinblätter gefüllt mit Reis
Zwiebeln, gekochter Reis 36% (Wasser, Reis), Weinblätter 17%, Olivenöl nativ extra 7%, Meersalz, Dill, Zitronensäure, Minze, Pfeffer schwarz.
Onassis Feuilles de Vigne Farcies avec Riz
riz (precuit 65%), feuilles de vigne (15%), huile de soja (10%), eau, oignons, sel, aneth, menthe, poivre noir, agent d'acidification: acide citrique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Weinblätter gefüllt mit Reis or Onassis Feuilles de Vigne Farcies avec Riz?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Weinblätter gefüllt mit Reis has fewer calories: 158 kcal versus 158 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Onassis Feuilles de Vigne Farcies avec Riz has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.