Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve vs Ginger Preserve
Overall, Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve
Ginger Preserve
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fr... | Ginger Preserve |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 258 kcal | 270 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 42.2 g | 59 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ginger Preserve has no fat, while Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve has 0.6 g.
- Ginger Preserve has no saturated fat, while Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve has 0.5 g.
- Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve has 28% less sugar (42.2 g vs 59 g).
- Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve has 100% more fiber (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve has 96% more protein (2.5 g vs 0.1 g).
Ingredients
Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve
Sugar, water, ginger, freacle, gelling agent: pectin, acidity regulator: citric acid. Prepared with 25g of ginger per 100g. Total sugar content 60g per 100g.
Ginger Preserve
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve or Ginger Preserve?
Overall, Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve has fewer calories: 258 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Warming Stem Ginger Extra Fruity Preserve has less sugar: 42.2 g versus 59 g per 100 g.